As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators::As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

  • cm0002@lemmy.worldEnglish
    47·
    11 months ago

    Ofc not, that’s way different, that’s beyond the use of public use.

    If I browse to your Instagram, look at some of your art, record some numbers about it, observe your style and then leave that’s perfectly fine right? If I then took my numbers and observations from your art and everybody else’s that I looked and merged them together to make my own style that would also be fine right? Well that’s AI, that’s all it does on a simple level

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      52·
      11 months ago

      But they are still profiting off of it. Dall-E doesn’t make images out of the kindness of OpenAI’s heart. They’re a for-profit company. That really doesn’t make it different from Disney, does it?

      • cm0002@lemmy.worldEnglish
        44·
        11 months ago

        Sure, Dall-E has a profit motive, but then what about all the open source models that are trained on the same or similar data and artworks?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
          52·
          11 months ago

          You’ve strayed very far from:

          if you post publicly, expect it to be used publicly

          What is the difference between Dall-E scraping the art and an open source model doing it other than Dall-E making money at it? It’s still using it publicly.

          • cm0002@lemmy.worldEnglish
            33·
            11 months ago

            I didn’t really stray far, you brought up that Dall-E has a profit motive and I acknowledged that yea that was true, but there also open source models that don’t