Hdcase@beehaw.org to Gaming@beehaw.org · 1 year agoBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down10
arrow-up179arrow-down1external-linkBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.netHdcase@beehaw.org to Gaming@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareEnzy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkSvenskaarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoThis game sure removed any hopes I had for TES6
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoNot trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me. But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout. Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
minus-squareEnzy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkSvenskaarrow-up2·1 year agoUsing the same engine no doubt I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.
This game sure removed any hopes I had for TES6
Not trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me.
But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout.
Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
Using the same engine no doubt
I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
Yes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.