Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoApple says it will remove services such as FaceTime and iMessage from the UK rather than weaken security if new proposals are made law and acted upon.www.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square358fedilinkarrow-up11.88Karrow-down133cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.84Karrow-down1external-linkApple says it will remove services such as FaceTime and iMessage from the UK rather than weaken security if new proposals are made law and acted upon.www.bbc.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square358fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareryannathans@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up87arrow-down3·1 year agoGod damn bullshit always “for children and terrorists”
minus-squarehiire@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 year agoI hate how people turn a blind eye to these things nowadays. They’re willing to give away their personal lives at the expense of the shittiest excuses out there. Privacy should be a necessity, ffs.
minus-squaredunestorm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoWhy don’t they just actually give their actual reason: to spy on UK citizens. To use children and criminals as a scapegoat for this attrocity is disgusting.
minus-squareperviouslyiner@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year ago“protect the public from criminals, child sex abusers and terrorists” Aren’t two of those just subsets of the first one? What a curious pair of emotionally manipulative examples to choose, when it adds absolutely no extra meaning to the Home Office’s statement.
minus-squaredarcy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoi would assume they mean ‘criminals, especially…’, but classic tHiNk oF tHe ChiLdReN argument
God damn bullshit always “for children and terrorists”
I hate how people turn a blind eye to these things nowadays. They’re willing to give away their personal lives at the expense of the shittiest excuses out there. Privacy should be a necessity, ffs.
Why don’t they just actually give their actual reason: to spy on UK citizens.
To use children and criminals as a scapegoat for this attrocity is disgusting.
“protect the public from criminals, child sex abusers and terrorists”
Aren’t two of those just subsets of the first one?
What a curious pair of emotionally manipulative examples to choose, when it adds absolutely no extra meaning to the Home Office’s statement.
i would assume they mean ‘criminals, especially…’, but classic tHiNk oF tHe ChiLdReN argument