I use Fedora 38, it’s stable, things just work, and the software is up-to-date.

  • Fal@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know how you deal with non rolling releases on your machines you actually use for work. By the end of the lifecycle all the tools are ancient

    • ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      ChojinDSL It depends on your use case. In my case I mostly manage bare metal servers running certain services or docker.

      For servers I don’t want rolling releases. That just means stuff is going to break on a regular basis. In my opinion, Arch Linux is the worst offender here. I don’t know if it’s gotten better since last I used it. But with Arch Linux the problem was, that you had to keep up with the updates. If you forgot to update some machine in a while, it could happen that you missed some update that changed some critical things, and everything else already moved on, and the only way to fix it was to hunt down the intermediate package version and try to install that manually, or just wipe and reinstall.

      As far as “ancient” tools is concerned, it depends on what those tools are. Bugfix and security patches is what I’m most interested in on a server. Just because there is a newer version of software out there with some new features, doesn’t mean that I need those features, or that they’re relevant.

      For the cases where I need something newer, there’s docker, flatpak and backports repos, (if not third party repos for certain tools).

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For servers I don’t want rolling releases

        Yeah I wasn’t talking about servers.