In this post-truth media landscape, what news sources/publications do you use & trust the most, and why?

  • Thesilverpig@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Trust no one. Using the framework of Noam chomskys manufacturing consent to help identify biases and read between the lines is a pretty good strategy though.

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    None of them have blanket trust. Read each article, dig through half a pound of bullshit to get to the facts behind the click bait headline. Then see if that makes sense. Seek out second source if the topic requires it.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      this. id say always check more sources if you are in doubt.

      every media company has its own bias (usually influenced by the owner) and you have to know what they are to understand what they will be manipulating or what agenda they will be pushing along with the actual facts. some might be more trustworthy for some subjects but not others.

      factor that in to your reading of the news and you will get a much better view of things.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Reuters and AP have both been extremely biased towards the perpetrators of the Gaza genocide.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Reuters lied about Maccabi supporters attacking Dutch people instead of the other way around and manufactured fake outrage about pogroms.

      Reuters also said they confirmed oct7 rape footage evidence which turned out to be a lie because it does not exist.

  • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    There are others, but I’d say these are the top in terms of credibility, investigative journalism, and reliability

    That said, it’s still best practice to cross verify reporting

    The Intercept

    Democracy Now

    Common Dreams

    ProPublica

    Mother Jones

    Jacobin

    Zeteo

    Drop Site News

    Al Jazeera

    +972 Magazine

    Human Rights Organizations

    Edit: adding Counter Punch

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dropsitenews

    DemocracyNow!

    Mintpressnews

    Theintercept

    KenKlippenstein

    Jacobin

    Why? Because they have not spread pro Israel propaganda without doing a minute amount fact checking. Or worse, straight up lying for Israel.

    There are a few, such as TheGuardian, which have spread massive Israeli propaganda for a year. They have recently turned around tried to put the mask back on. But they have already shown their true face.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Israel propaganda without doing a minute amount fact checking

      sometimes you get some hints they are reporting relatively fairly about stuff you don’t know yet because of how they are reporting things you know. just be careful with not getting too sure you know.

      not specifically vouching for any of these outlets either, just highlighting this rule of thumb.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I feel like their bias is to simply not cover things they do not want to show.

        But the reason I find them more credible is because they are able to provide sources and not quote their own random anonymous journalists. If I can check the sources I can verify claims.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    None in isolation.

    CBC is a pretty reliable go-to although they’re more than a bit pandering these days. BBC is similar. Al Jazeera is pretty reliable for things not related to Islam and Palestine in particular (although they’re not as biased as they could be). AP is fairly neutral. Aside from that, it’s non-legacy Canadian sources like the Walrus and the Tyee, which all have their problems but are good at exposing reality.

  • Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    For my mental health’s sake, I don’t watch any news source.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    BBC

    The ABC

    Guardian

    Democracy Now

    CBC

    NPR

    Basically anyone who is getting removeded at for not towing the line

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If you still trust those after their coverage of the Gaza genocide has been so extremely biased towards the perpetrator, I would encourage you to rethink.

    • Philosaraptor7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Democracy now!!! Yas.

      Good collection. I like just kinda getting a grasp on what the biase is and holding it loosely.

      I like cbc its public etc. Pretty balanced. Yet we also know it is neo-liberal and likely to indulge a bit far on some gender politics etc. I agree, having several outlets is important.

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Peoplesdispatch is one I put high trust into but all reporting is inherently biased and should be read with an understanding of its biases. I also like the Al Jazeera and Jacobin but both of those can be hit or miss sometimes. Especially the Jacobin lmao

  • Libra00@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t trust a particular source. I sorta trust GroundNews to at least show me the bias and give me less-overtly-biased alternatives. Otherwise I am more trustful in general (but don’t fully trust) investigative journalism orgs like ProPublica, independent journalists like Ken Klippenstein, etc.