• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The appendix was/is a repository for gut biome when humans getting diarrhea was as regular as Tuesdays. An occasional death from a burst appendix was the lesser evil

    It was really important back then. But then we developed safer food/water practices and it was basically useless. But still bursting on occasion.

    So there was a very slow march towards people just not having them. Over a long enough timeline that would have spread and the appendix would have gone the way of the human tail.

    But now that we can remove them, there’s no negative evolutionary pressure, and we’re probably going to stay around .001% of people born without an appendix.

    It’s a great example of how medicine and science actively stalls evolution.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eyesight will get worse over time now, but people can see better than ever… it’s a bizarre contradiction.

      Until you consider medicine and technology to be part of the aggregate evolutionary progress. In which case, we’re racing ahead!

      I don’t think we see a return to traditional evolutionary pressure unless we get truly isolated populations again, coupled with a major global disaster. That, or people living in space.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until you consider medicine and technology to be part of the aggregate evolutionary progress

        No, that stuff is memetic instead of genetic.

        You can say it’s human society evolving, but it’s not humans evolving.

        • getseclectic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there is a strong argument that we have been post human since we developed writing and that a ‘person’ encompasses more than just their meat sack. I was first introduced to this idea by the book Natural Born Cyborgs. You are taking a narrower view of the word evolution, but I’m not totally sure it’s justified.

        • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can see the argument that it’s part of the evolutionary advantage conferred by bigger brains, vocal chords, and opposable thumbs.