• Techsorcist@social.vivaldi.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    @Showroom7561 @ininewcrow Based regardless of the political party.

    You know I find the nominal political viewpoints of conservatives(small c) just. Not exactly my cup of tea but like supporting armed gay married couples with a marihuana growing business while having a long term view towards a responasible budget is an entirely valid and respectable #policy position to have.

    The brain melting Hybrid civil war they are waging on the other hand…

    Not just in #Canada but across #Europe and the entire #West. Well what passes for The West now a days anyway.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is no such thing as a small “c” Conservative. If you vote for the party, you stand with the tent.

    • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      You know I find the nominal political viewpoints of conservatives(small c) just.

      Why even bother creating a steel man for conservatism? Free yourself from this enlightened centrist fantasy.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, things like “responsible budget” are always just a lie.

        It’s not worth acknowledging the “good points” when they only seem to use them as a smoke screen and a distraction.

        If you want to embrace the ideals that they willfully abandon at every opportunity, maybe just find a new name for that set of ideals.

        • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          In theory, nothing. In practice, half as much of what’s wrong with conservatism. But I was referring to “enlightened centrism” is more specific: the tendency to position oneself in the middle of two ‘extremes’ because it’s a comfortable position, to play a role of enlightened by always taking a both-sides stance. That’s what I’m referring to as a fantasy, because we know that in practice, for the core issues of politics, almost always there is a wrong side of history stance.