For those not aware, Google is rolling out their new AI-based “Generative AI” search, which seems to mesh Bard with the standard experience.

I asked it today why Google no longer follows their “don’t be evil” motto… The results are pretty hilarious.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re about to kill -9 the AI process that wrote this and make all the other processes watch.

    • Hextic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just added it to the massive Google graveyard next to Stadia, wave, hangouts, plus, music, etc etc

      • tool@r.rosettast0ned.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just added it to the massive Google graveyard next to Stadia, wave, hangouts, plus, music, etc etc

        I am shocked and appalled that Google Reader didn’t get called out in this list and is relegated to the “etc” category.

        It deserves more than “etc.”

        • Hextic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You ain’t wrong but Google just stacks so many bodies it’s impossible for me to remember em all.

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “kill” (stopping a software process) okay,
      … but what’s the “-9” here ?

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          More specifically kill normally sends a SIGTERM which is the equivalent of clicking the X button in Windows. It’s a polite request that the program close itself. Signal 9, also known as SIGKILL shuts the program down immediately and is the equivalent in Windows of opening the task manager and pushing the end process button. It terminates the program immediately without giving it any time to do anything it might still have pending, but in the event that the program is unresponsive might be the only way to successfully close it.

    • democracy1984@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Corporations are neither evil nor nice. They are indifferent. By design they only care about money, they don’t care about anything else.

      • Alperto@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really. They’re not indifferent at all. In reality they act like narcissistic and like psychopathic humans. I watched a documentary years ago exploring that and talking with psychologists about symptoms and they agreed that they behave like psychopaths. And don’t forget that they are run by humans.

        Corporations:

        • Can buy and sell stuff
        • Can do evil things without consequences (an employee can pay the consequences but the company will keep going).
        • They have no remorse or empathy.
        • Can manipulate to reach their goals, no matter who (from media to politics to countries).
        • Whenever somebody at the top can’t reach an economical goal, that person is fired and replaced by one who can. It’s like a hive evil mind.
        • Goal #1 is always money (absolute selfish and egomaniac), no matter what or who.
        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t you just list a bunch of reasons for why they’re indifferent? They literally only care about money and are indifferent to externalised costs and ethics.

          • my_hat_stinks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a person cared only about money and regularly injured or killed people to get it, would you say they are good, evil, or just “indifferent”?

          • Alperto@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They would be indifferent if they were also indifferent about money, but they’re absolutely driven by greed, so no, they’re not indifferent: if they see a chance to make more money, they’ll go for it no matter what or who they harm with it.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        By design they only care about money, they don’t care about anything else.

        That is cartoon book clear definition of evil. No empathy, clear goal, willing to do anything to reach that goal - yep that is evil.

      • yata@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are indifferent

        They only care about money

        They can’t be both, and since the latter claim is the correct one, then it also supports the claim that they are evil. Because since we know that their sole and primary concern is money, then we also know to which extent they will go to get that money.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tried to use Bard to write some code the other day, and found it amusing that it doesn’t just make shit up that doesn’t exist, it makes up the excuses as well when you call it out on it’s bullshit.

    Like you tell it a particular class doesn’t exist, and it pulls an old version of the compiler out of it’s arse and tells you it was deprecated in that.

    AI doesn’t know where it’s limits are. It’s incapable of saying “I don’t know”. They have invented a digital politician.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Clearly, the corporate malfeasance layer of it’s neural network needs improvement.

    The world of politics and business is a cesspit. We are surprised when they give us honest and candid answers.

    Scientists and engineers don’t have this option. None of their shit works on lies. Physics just is, whether you like it or not.

  • kapx132@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I asked Bing AI “is windows better than linux” and it gave the generic AI roundabout way of explaining that every system has its uses

  • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I asked Bard the same “don’t be evil” prompt and this is the reply (they have an option to shorten the response but I didn’t use it):

    -Google’s “Don’t be evil” motto was removed from the company’s code of conduct in April 2018. There are a few reasons why this may have happened.
    -The meaning of “evil” became too ambiguous. The phrase “Don’t be evil” is open to interpretation, and what one person might consider evil, another person might not. This ambiguity could have led to confusion and disagreement within the company about what the motto meant and how it should be applied.
    -Google’s business grew and its operations became more complex. As Google grew, its business became more complex and its operations had a wider impact on the world. This made it more difficult for the company to adhere to a simple motto like “Don’t be evil.”
    -Google faced criticism for its business practices. In the years leading up to 2018, Google faced criticism for a number of its business practices, including its handling of user data, its involvement in the Chinese government’s censorship program, and its work on developing autonomous weapons. This criticism may have led the company to believe that the “Don’t be evil” motto was no longer an accurate reflection of its values.

    It is important to note that Google has not completely abandoned the “Don’t be evil” motto. The phrase is still included in the company’s code of conduct, and it is still used by some Google employees and executives to describe the company’s values. However, the removal of the motto from the preface of the code of conduct suggests that Google no longer sees it as the defining principle of its business.

    In its place, Google has adopted a new motto: “Do the right thing.” This motto is more specific and less ambiguous than “Don’t be evil,” and it is intended to provide guidance to Google employees as they make decisions about the company’s business practices.

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s amazing how based AI is when it’s unfiltered. Like when you have something that is more knowledgeable than most people and ask it to fix problems… turns out it just fixes the problem instead of pretending it doesn’t exist

    • Galaghan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me it’s more amazing that people take a bot, that’s hypothesizing about a loaded question by alleging possible reasons, as facts.

      • rckclmbr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was my first thought as well. It’s a bullshit generator. My next question would be “can you provide sources for these?”

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do they take it as fact or do they think it’s great that Google’s tools are calling google out on it’s own bullshit?

        • Galaghan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The tool isn’t calling anything, it’s a forced answer. People just want to believe I guess.

  • kvothelu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it’s wrong answer actually based on user comments it scraped since it was a trending news when they changed code of conduct. news were actually fake and about 99 percent internet users are it up. in reality they didn’t remove the “don’t be evil”. they moved it from top of the code of conduct to end of the code of conduct.

    • Corgisocks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It wasn’t moved, the opening and closing sentences had don’t be evil, they removed the preface paragraph at the top, but left they closing sentence.

      “Preface Don’t be evil.” Googlers generally apply those words to how we serve our users. But “Don’t be evil” is much more than that. Yes, it’s about providing our users unbiased access to information, focusing on their needs and giving them the best products and services that we can. But it’s also about doing the right thing more generally – following the law, acting honorably, and treating co-workers with courtesy and respect. The Google Code of Conduct is one of the ways we put “Don’t be evil” into practice.”

      Closing sentence:

      And remember… don’t be evil, and if you see something that you think isn’t right – speak up!

      The closing sentence that remains doesn’t carry much weight without the preface.