Age Reversal Breakthrough: Harvard/MIT Discovery Could Enable Whole-Body Rejuvenation::In a pioneering study, researchers from Harvard Medical School, University of Maine, and MIT have introduced a chemical method for reversing cellular aging. This revolutionary approach offers a potential alternative to gene therapy for age reversal. The findings could transform treatments for age-re

    • belshamharoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The full journal article says “in vivo” not “in vitro”. They have already successfully regenerated mice which are organisms biologically similar to humans.


      Edit

      I was wrong about this. The journal article does only talk about results obtained “in vitro” but mentions other studies that have successfully reversed cellular ageing “in vivo”.

      The ability of the Yamanaka factors to erase cellular identity raised a key question: is it possible to reverse cellular aging in vivo without causing uncontrolled cell growth and tumorigenesis? Initially, it didn’t seem so, as mice died within two days of expressing OSKM. But work by the Belmonte lab, our lab, and others have confirmed that it is possible to safely improve the function of tissues in vivo by pulsing OSKM expression [22, 23] or by continuously expressing only OSK, leaving out the oncogene c-MYC

      So in this study the results were only in vitro but other studies have successfully reversed cellular ageing in vivo.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Worry? I’m excited for it man.

      They don’t realize they’re messing with a monkeys paw.

      The first gen lifers are gonna live to regret their discovery.

  • zensoup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ahh, immortal super-rich people whose views get more and more conservative as they age forever… What an exciting future to look forward to!

    • CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only upside I can think of is they’d actually start caring about the planet instead of thinking they’ll be dead in 100 years anyway.

      • gdrhnvfhj@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They try to get so rich no matter what, so they can evade all consequences. (That’s not possible, but they want to believe it)

    • TheCraiggers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see one potential good thing though: maybe people would be less interested in killing the only planet that supports human life if they knew they were going to be on it forever.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The other implication of that show is that you need to keep paying, even after you’re dead. You are no longer earning anything in the afterlife and are entirely dependent on having family/friends/loved ones continue paying for your access to the upper tier. But once the “second death” where people forget about you happens, the poor experience is inevitable, and you accept that you’re nothing more than a scanned consciousness to be used by this corporation for profit.

      • rasikww@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like how you only mentioned the first season, I didn’t watch season 2 at all…

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Peter Thiel and probably Donald Trump have supposedly been injecting themselves with children’s blood, or at least a derivative from their blood.

  • CaffeinatedOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if for the rich, this would be good news. The rich and powerful will stop ignoring things like distant climate related deadlines, if they think they’ll be alive to feel their effects.

    • insta11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If this take is anything like whales with stock they’ll just jump ship onto the next country/planet to start over it’s a never ending cycle

      A lot of the rich/ultra wealthy are selfish and don’t give a fuck unless it directly affects them so I don’t foresee any accountability if the planet Implodes instead they’ll just fling their money at the next thing that buys them a ticket out of here

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly don’t think so. I don’t think they care of the condition worsen, including theirs as long as they stay above the poorer people.

      Like, if we look at the living condition of a medieval era king. You live in a stone castle do your bedroom as freezing temperature in winter, terrible healthcare so you might be in terrible pain for things that easily treatable, no hygiene the smells everywhere must be horrible… Compared with the comfort of a normal person in a developed country. ( Not the US though, now like Denmark or Switzerland) the modern life is clearly way more comfortable.

      However I suspect that a lot of people, especially richer people would prefer to be the king, despite the conditions.

  • Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biochemist here, It’s almost certainly an overhyped study. The operative term being used here is “potentially” full body rejuvenation is possible. It doesn’t address issues such as administration of the therapy in tissues with virtually no turnover rate, including cardiac tissue, skeletal muscle, and nervous tissue. You cannot renew something that the body doesn’t naturally replace via the cell cycle.

  • evranch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Full text of actual paper: https://www.aging-us.com/full/204896

    Tldr; seems like decent science and the compounds used are fairly ordinary ones for the most part. Note however this is all in vitro so far and it might be a challenge to deliver the same chemicals in the same concentrations to all the senescent cells of the body.

    Prepare to see these ingredients added in insignificant amounts to expensive skin creams before the year is out, whether they can penetrate the epidermis or not

  • belshamharoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why a cure for ageing would benefit everyone and not solely the ultra wealthy

    If you put aside ethical and humanitarian reasons for making a cure for ageing widely available, there is still economic considerations, i.e. if you are a government you will be presented with a choice between:

    Do I pay to treat people for ageing, even though the treatment might initially be expensive, or do I let them age without intervention?

    The former option might actually be significantly cheaper because people in an advanced state of ageing cost more money. They have more diseases, since many diseases are age related such as dementia, cancer and cardiac disease, and need more healthcare and also can’t work anymore.

    If instead, the government pays for rejuvenation treatment they save on all the other healthcare costs and their people don’t have to stop being productive.

    So perhaps in the future when a cure for ageing is actually developed it will be made available for everyone rich and poor alike

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me start by saying that I haven’t read the article or the study, but I would be very suspicious that this could stop, slow, delay or reverse cancer. In fact, I would guess that it would actually cause more cancer. I hope I’m wrong.

      We would also have to consider the impact of people living longer would have on the environment. People will still be having kids, and if you were going to live longer you might want to have many more kids while you’re young. Our rock is going to get pretty crowded really fast if people stop dying of old age.

      Then there’s the point about people still being ‘productive’ to society. Honestly, if I’m going to live longer, I don’t want it to be so I can continue to be productive. I don’t like being productive as it is. I’d prefer that humanity focus first on fixing our economy before trying to extend our lives.

      Despite appearances, I’m not trying to argue with you for the sake of argument, but more just putting other ideas out there to consider. I do hope your vision is right, and this will be something available to everyone and helps to make our final years more pleasant.

  • drapermache@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Couldn’t you wait until Mitch Mconnell died until you released this? I’d rather not him be in the senate forever.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes paywalls only hit you after you’ve visited a handful of articles.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Before people lose their minds, this research, while interesting, is very far from true aging reversal. At most it could be one aspect of it.

    • cottard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for reminding me to prioritize the capacity for dignified exit from the game.