A rising movement of artists and authors are suing tech companies for training AI on their work without credit or payment

  • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not being creative. It’s generating a statistically likely facsimile with a seperate set of input parameters. It’s sampling, but keeping the same pattern of beats even if the order of the notes changes.

    • Peaces@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Though, at what point does sampling become coherentism from philosophy? In the end, whether an AI performs “coherently” is all that matters. I think we are amazed now at ChatGPT because of the quality LLM from 2021 but that value will degrade or become less “coherent” over time, i.e. model collapse.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because I never think I can post it enough, Let’s forget the term AI. Let’s call them Systematic Approaches to Learning Algorithms and Machine Inferences (SALAMI).

      So much confusion and prejudice is thrown into this discussion by the mere fact that they’re called AIs. I don’t believe they are intelligent anymore than I believe a calculator is.

      And even if they are, the AIs don’t have the needs the humans do. So we still must value the work of the humans more highly than the work of the AIs.