nuff said

  • AChiTenshi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Perhaps. But a rather large issue arises when your content is generated primarily by users who wouldn’t want to pay for a service.

    There is also the issue where if you are having to pay to get around interaction limits is it really free speech? Or just limited to those that can afford to pay?

    • traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think these limits were increased to a point where they are not really bad or they were removed. The point of them was to prevent scraping to train AIs

        • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d argue it’s a poisoned dataset. You can’t validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content.