I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as a wheel, is in fact, a cart and a wheel, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, a cart plus a wheel. A wheel is not a vehicle unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning cart system made useful by the cart’s frame, steering components, and vital structural elements comprising a full vehicle as defined by cart-dynamics. Many people move things every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of the cart which is widely used today is often called “a wheel,” and many of its users are not aware that it is basically a cart, developed by the Cart Project. There really is a wheel, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. A wheel is a part: the circular component in the system that allows the cart to roll across the ground. A wheel is an essential part of a cart, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete cart. A wheel is normally used in combination with the Cart System: the whole system is basically a cart with a wheel added, or a cart and a wheel.

Sorry guys. I let a llm rewrite it, I was too lazy.

• Do you mainly play games? -> bazzite, nobara
• Do you want to get to know your system and read package updates on a daily basis? -> arch
• do you want to control your system? Nix
• do you want an end user system? Fedora, opensuse or mint
• do you like pain? -> ubuntu

I was not disappointed reading the article. It delivers what I expected.

According to Google, here’s how to install software on Rhino Linux using …

According to google?

Imagine a Linux distribution that takes the very best the Linux ecosystem has to offer and, driven by bold ambition—or something like it—sets out to improve on it. Whether those improvements are truly necessary or not is up for debate.

Peopel start using scrolling window managers and the best you have to offer is a panel on the left. Having icons on the bottom is easier on the eyes for me. It is “hard work” to look to the side.

Rhino Linux’s latest version is 2025.3, a rolling-release distribution based on Ubuntu,

What does that mean? It’s rolling, hence whenever upstream publishes updates, they are implemented in rhino? Hence, whenever ubuntu updates, rhino updates.

To be fair, calling Unicorn an Xfce desktop is like saying driving a Yugo is the same as piloting a Ferrari—Unicorn takes some getting used to.

It looks like xfce, it is based on xfce.

The changes don’t stop there.

Nice!

Want to add software? Welcome to Pacstall, which helps deliver the most up-to-date software—including many packages not found in standard repositories.

Wow, it can add third party repos! This is innovative!

Good actors are punished and bad ones aren’t?

Why limit it to open source software?

Set a flag date by which any open source software not built from source must be delisted from Flathub.

Why is it ok for proprietary software to not build from source, but for open source it’s not ok?

I use (atomic) fedora and I don’t have to deal with drivers or anything system related. Among other good distros, I can highly recommend that for a set it and forgrt it system.

Stupid original title

Firefox Catches Up to Chrome With the Addition of This Feature But Leaves Linux Out (for now)

Yes. It is arch with a calamaris installer.

Looking forward, analysts predict Linux could hit 7% by 2027 if trends continue, driven by AI integrations in distributions like those from Canonical

Sure. That must be the reason.

Because of sound quality, bass and the external ones live longer than the laptop. You also pay more if you have “better” speakers in each laptop you buy instead of paying once for external ones.

I can understand all but following reasin

Good speakers that get reasonably loud and don’t have downward-facing tweeters

Why do you even care about built-in speakers? Either use proper speakers or headphones.

My guess:

• More personalized ads
• less customization
• fewer functionality
• more pay for the CEO
• development behind closed doors like AOSP
• own search engine

ARCH is nor really unstable. Debian is not really more stable than other distros. People just repeat stupid stuff. Both (all big) distros are reliable. Still don’t use arch for work. DE is distor independent. The days are far over from choosing a distro based on DE.

For work an atomic distro that is always working like fedora is really nice.

Gaming is also DE independent.

I spend very few minutes on maintenance and let fedora do all that. I use my system, I don’t baby sit it.

ARCH is nor really unstable. Debian is not really more stable than other distros. People just repeat stupid stuff. Both (all big) distros are reliable. Still don’t use arch for work. DE is distor independent. The days are far over from choosing a distro based on DE.

For work an atomic distro that is always working like fedora is really nice.

Gaming is also DE independent.

I spend very few minutes on maintenance and let fedora do all that. I use my system, I don’t baby sit it.

I don’t get it.

As such, users now have the option to choose between cachyos-fish-config and cachyos-zsh-config. "If neither is selected, the system will default to Bash. The default configuration will still be Fish …

You can choose between fish and zsh and if you don’t select anything it selects bash but fish is default? Huh?

Meaning, fish is preselected and you have to unselect fish in order to get bash?

Like:

Which shell do you want (deselect for bash)? [x] fish [ ] zsh

Rustdeck sounds like a home-dashboard, center, whatever for rust.

[immutable] … and the name is there so we’re stuck with it.

Not really. We move(d) to atomic.

I should like any effort towards linux but telling all of the migrants that they made a bad choice because of snaps stops me from liking it

Thanks for the analysis!

Looks like ai crap