I’m wondering, the integrated RAM like Intel did for Lunar Lake, could the same performance be achieved with the latest CAMM modules? The only real way to go integrated to get the most out of it is doing it with HBM, anything else seems like a bad trade-off.

So either you go HBM with real bandwidth and latency gains or CAMM with decent performance and upgradeable RAM sticks. But the on-chip ram like Intel did is neither providing the HBM performance nor the CAMM modularity.

They used PimEyes, nothing new.

Of importance: they do not want to release the tool but use it as a way to raise awareness.

The whole talk is available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNK4aSv-krI

This specific one is at 39min.

You mean between the French article and the English comment? :)

The way I see it, is because of the controls. You have a much stronger reaction with a mouse than a joystick. Anytime you play with a mouse, the reaction time is expected to be lower because you I dictate where you want to be looking (like in am fps). The mouse acts as a view positioning device. It is not forgiving. A joystick however is a rotation device. It tells how fast you want to be moving around when looking, not where it should be looking. It is much more forgiving because you only dictate the speed of rotation. If you plugged in a mouse in your deck and played it on the deck you would immediately notice the difference I imagine. I think the trackpads do bring some aspects of the mouse to the deck too in that regard.

But yeah, my takeaway is, with a joystick you don’t need that tight of a latency as with a mouse.

From what I understand, bsky’s architecture seems to allow federation at multiple levels. On one side the individual profiles are actually websites and the app aggregates the content almost as an RSS reader. I do see some profiles which are independent like Jeff Gierling’s, so yes federation at the profile level seems to work.

And this is really important because it is one way to prevent your data from being hostage by the service. Then there is another level of federation. I’m not entirely sure of the terminology here, but there is one aggregator aspect, which is quite compute intensive. And that one I don’t know if there is another instance of it. But functionally speaking, I’m quite impressed by the technical aspect of bsky. There has been a lot of thought put into it.

And monetizing it is not the issue, the problem is mostly how. That they have some paid features is fine, it’s even important that there are ways to monetize it without milking their users of their privacy.

Let’s hope this works out and becomes sustainable while respecting the users!

I’m very grateful for your extended help. I’ve made some progress. I’m able to get the prompt to appear asking me for my passphrase to unlock the right partition (sda3 in my case). Entering the passphrase, however, drops me in the Dracut emergency shell after ~3min of dracut logs, seemingly looping. (Edit: the reason for why it drops me in the shell is very unclear. It says Dropping to debug shell. /bin/sh: can't access tty: job control turned off. And if I try to exit the dracut shell, it says dracut Warning: could not boot.).

In the Dracut emergency shell, checking /dev/mapper/ I see a luks-<sda3-uuid> listed. Running blkid I see it listed too with TYPE=crypto_LUKS. I also see a dev/dm-0 with a dedicated UUID, in ext4. I ran blkid which shows:

/dev/mapper/luks-705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5: UUID="57955343-922a-4918-9bc1-797ca8d13a9c" TYPE="ext4"
/dev/sda1: UUID="cc5e0b03-3544-4bef-ab8b-8b72dd236926" TYPE="ext4"
/dev/sda2: UUID="4df1af6c-3199-4bb2-bb12-bcf897cfc6fc" TYPE="swap"
/dev/sda3: UUID="705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5" TYPE="crypto_LUKS"
/dev/dm-0: UUID="57955343-922a-4918-9bc1-797ca8d13a9c" TYPE="ext4"

I checked the status of the filesystem running cryptsetup status /dev/mapper/luks-<sda3-uuid> and it says it is active, which I guess means it is unlocked?

I checked the /root directory, and it is empty. So I tried to mount the partition myself: mount /dev/mapper/luks-<sda3-uuid> /root but it fails saying mount: mounting /dev/mapper/luks-<sda3-uuid> on /root failed: No such file or directory and that got me really puzzled? I’ve been searching far and wide but I can’t seem to find anyone with a similar situation. I feel like I’m close to getting this working.

Below is my syslinux kernel config, and the 2nd and 3rd items are what I booted into (/boot/extlinux.conf)

# Generated by update-extlinux 6.04_pre1-r15
DEFAULT menu.c32
PROMPT 0
MENU TITLE Alpine/Linux Boot Menu
MENU HIDDEN
MENU AUTOBOOT Alpine will be booted automatically in # seconds.
TIMEOUT 10
LABEL lts
  MENU DEFAULT
  MENU LABEL Linux lts
  LINUX vmlinuz-lts
  INITRD initramfs-lts
  APPEND root=/dev/mapper/root modules=sd-mod,usb-storage,ext4 cryptroot=UUID=705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5 cryptdm=root rootfstype=ext4 rd.debug log_buf_len=1M rd.shell

LABEL lts
  MENU DEFAULT
  MENU LABEL Dracut Linux lts
  LINUX vmlinuz-lts
  INITRD /boot/initramfs-6.6.56-0-lts.img
  APPEND root=/dev/mapper/luks-705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5 modules=sd-mod,usb-storage,ext4 rootfstype=ext4 rd.shell rd.debug log_buf_len=1M rd.luks.uuid=705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5

LABEL lts
  MENU DEFAULT
  MENU LABEL Dracut Linux lts 2
  LINUX vmlinuz-lts
  INITRD /boot/initramfs-6.6.56-0-lts.img
  APPEND modules=sd-mod,usb-storage,ext4,dm,crypt,rootfs-block rootfstype=ext4 rootflags=rw,relatime rd.shell rd.debug log_buf_len=1M root=UUID=57955343-922a-4918-9bc1-797ca8d13a9c rd.luks.uuid=705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5

And here the /proc/cmdline of the booted partition:

BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz-lts modules=sd-mod,usb-storage,ext4,dm,crypt,rootfs-block rootfstype=ext4 rootflags=rw,relatime rd.shell rd.debug log_buf_len=1M root=UUID=57955343-922a-4918-9bc1-797ca8d13a9c rd.luks.uuid=705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5 initrd=/boot/initramfs-6.6.56-0-lts.img

Here is my setup, when I boot in my regular initramfs (the one I’m trying to replicate using dracut):

mytestalpine:~# lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,FSVER,LABEL,UUID,FSAVAIL,FSUSE%,MOUNTPOINTS
NAME     FSTYPE      FSVER LABEL UUID                                 FSAVAIL FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS
sda                                                                                  
├─sda1   ext4                    cc5e0b03-3544-4bef-ab8b-8b72dd236926  195.5M    21% /boot
├─sda2   swap                    4df1af6c-3199-4bb2-bb12-bcf897cfc6fc                [SWAP]
└─sda3   crypto_LUKS             705fc477-573a-4ef6-81b6-a14c43cda1f5                
  └─root ext4                    57955343-922a-4918-9bc1-797ca8d13a9c    2.3G     8% /

mytestalpine:~# lsblk -l -n /dev/sda3
sda3   8:3   0  2.8G 0 part  
root 253:0   0  2.8G 0 crypt /

Note: No idea of the relevance, but I’m testing this setup in a VM, with a BIOS firmware.

That does not sound like a viable long term solution to me.

Wizz

Thank you for your help. I spent time digging into this rabbit hole, and while I’ve learned a lot, I am struggling to get the basics to work. Right now, I’m focusing on being able to just boot an image I created using dracut, excluding all the initial stuff I wanted, just be able to reproduce the original functionality of being able to unlock my luks partition using my keyboard.

Where I’m at: I am building my initramfs using the following command: dracut -f -v --add crypt --add lvm --add dm. I get the following output log:

Then I updated the /boot/extlinux.conf file, adding the following second entry (displaying the first one just for comparison):

LABEL lts
  MENU DEFAULT
  MENU LABEL Linux lts
  LINUX vmlinuz-lts
  INITRD initramfs-lts
  APPEND root=/dev/mapper/root modules=sd-mod,usb-storage,ext4 cryptroot=<my-uuid> cryptdm=root quiet rootfstype=ext4

LABEL lts
  MENU LABEL dracut-img
  LINUX vmlinuz-lts
  INITRD /boot/initramfs-6.6.56-0-lts.img
  APPEND root=/dev/mapper/root modules=sd-mod,usb-storage,ext4 cryptroot=UUID=<my-uuid> cryptdm=root quiet rootfstype=ext4 rootflags=rw,relatime

I added the rootflags=rw,relatime because this was shown in the dracut log, so I thought perhaps that mattered. But for the most part I left it the same as the previous entry, because I’m trying to do the same thing I suppose. Perhaps I’m mistaken?

The current result of booting that image leads to a long loading (not asking for the passphrase to unlock the partition) then displaying the following error:

dracut Warning: Could not boot.

dracut Warning: "/dev/mapper/root" does not exist

Generating "/run/initramfs/rdsosreport.txt"
You might want to save "/run/initramfs/rdsosreport.txt" to a USB stick or /boot after mounting them and attach it to a bug report.

To get more debug information in the report, reboot with "rd.debug" added to the kernel command line.

Dropping to debug shell.

Before dropping me in a shell, in which I have not found anything useful to do. I am surely missing something basic as my understanding of what’s happening is pretty superfluous.

What I’m noticing which may be of importance:

• dracut[E]: ldconfig exited ungracefully, in the dracut output log. Perhaps this matters and should be fixed? An image is nonetheless generated.
• there are many missing modules when creating an image, but I don’t know if any of them matter, at least for my purpose.
• One thing I can’t wrap my head around is, how come the original kernal image work, when I had packages such as device-mapper and lvm missing, why did dracut complain about them missing for me to compile my own image? and would I need to add options in the /boot/extlinux.conf file, when they are not required for the original boot entry, when all I’m trying to do (as a start) is just make sure I can reproduce a bootable kernel image?

Have you installed google services on your phone? they are available through the grapheneOS official “App Store” app. This should be installed before whatsapp is installed (at least that is the instruction for general apps depending on google services).

Perhaps you have done so already, but just a general advice: when using google services and invasive apps like WhatsApp, it can be a good idea to install in their dedicated profile and allow the notifications to pipe through to your main profile instead of installing both in your main profile. If you need help configuring it, let me know.

deleted by creator

They don’t have to have a backdoor. They are most likely in possession of a master key to decrypt your data:

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/04/apple-holds-the-master-key-when-it-comes-to-icloud-security-privacy/

You mean this key? https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/04/apple-holds-the-master-key-when-it-comes-to-icloud-security-privacy/

The framework laptop, a modular laptop, now has a risc v motherboard, to be used in their computers. Framework prides itself in being a good open source steward and you can read more about the motherboard here and buy it here (when it will be available):

https://frame.work/products/deep-computing-risc-v-mainboard

https://frame.work/blog/introducing-a-new-risc-v-mainboard-from-deepcomputing

It may have been the case in the past but Ive used both the GTX 680 and RTX 3060 on Fedora with no issue whatsoever. I have veen using the nvidia peoprietary drivers and they work well.

Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic and co should help fight this fight, their tools are the problem here.

indeed! so there must be more to this. So how does it actually work?

Many such lawsuits have ended in settlements outside of courts, so I’m guessing many legal claims have not been validated or invalidated in court yet. This can be good or bad of course. But now, if this guy goes to court, I’m actually concerned because it may give an unchallenged path to Nintendo’s legal arguments and assuming the court decides he’s guilty, there will be precedent of these legal claims having been vetted in court. Would that not be worse for anyone in the future who would want to challenge Nintendo’s legal claims?

Thank you for your help.

I decided to give dracut a shot, see how far I could get.

I created a directory /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/99usb-mount in which I created two scripts: A first module /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/99usb-mount/module-setup.sh, executable:

#!/bin/bash

check() {
    return 0
}

depends() {
    echo "crypt"
    return 0
}

install() {
    inst_hook pre-mount 90 "$moddir/usb-mount.sh"
}

And a second script /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/99usb-mount/usb-mount.sh, also executable:

#!/bin/bash

LUKS_PARTITION=/dev/sda3
USB_NKL=/dev/disk/by-uuid/<MY-UUID>
USB_MOUNT_DIR=/mnt/my-usb/
KEY_FILENAME=mykey.key

# Wait for the USB to be detected and available
for i in {1..10}; do
    if [ -b ${USB_NKL} ]; then
        break
    fi
    sleep 1
done

# Mount the USB stick
mount ${USB_NKL} ${USB_MOUNT_DIR}

# Check if the mount was successful
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
    echo "Failed to mount USB stick"
    exit 1
fi

# Unlock the LUKS partition using the keyfile
if [ -e "${USB_MOUNT_DIR}/${KEY_FILENAME}" ]; then
    cryptsetup luksOpen "${LUKS_PARTITION}" cryptroot --key-file "${USB_MOUNT_DIR}/${KEY_FILENAME}"
else
    echo "Keyfile not found!"
    echo "Failed to unlock LUKS partition"
    exit 1
fi

I then fixed some dependencies and got around installing device-mapper, providing dmsetup, required by dm, required by crypt, required by my scripts.

Then I ran: dracut -f, which didn’t seem to have any issue and includes my module:

[...]
dracut[I]: *** Including module: usb-mount ***
[...]
dracut[E]: ldconfig exited ungracefully
[...]
dracut[I]: *** Creating initramfs image file '/boot/initramfs-6.6.54-0-lts.img' done ***

Not sure if this ldconfig error should be of any concern? The end image seems to have been created successfully.

When I check the verbose output, I see my module being included:

dracut[D]: -rwxr-xr-x 0/0       747 2024-10-07 22:30:00 lib/dracut/hooks/pre-mount/90-usb-mount.sh

However, it is here numbered 90 when above I had placed it in 99, no idea what that’s about? (edit: actually I wrote 90 in the module-setup.sh, so this is normal I guess).

Then I rebooted with my key and the prompt for my password to unlock my LUKS partition still appeared.

In the kernel messages I see my usb stick being detected (perhaps not mounted?) prior to the password prompt, so not sure what’s going on. Do you see any issue with my attempt? Or would you happen to have any propositions for debugging this further? I’m a bit lost as to how I can diagnose the issue.

Here are the kernel messages regarding the usb detection and a few seconds later, me unlocking the LUKS partition:

[    1.748076] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd # usb 1-1 / sdb is my USBkey. It seems to have been detected but not mounted?
[    2.068060] device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
[    2.068190] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.48.0-ioctl (2023-03-01) initialised: [email protected]
[    2.078157] Key type encrypted registered
[    2.153792] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=067b, idProduct=2517, bcdDevice= 1.00
[    2.153799] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=4, SerialNumber=6
[    2.153801] usb 1-1: Product: ClipDrive
[    2.153803] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: BUFFALO
[    2.153805] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: A9200502030000221
[    2.155494] usb-storage 1-1:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected
[    2.157341] scsi host3: usb-storage 1-1:1.0
[    2.159772] usbcore: registered new interface driver uas
[    3.221531] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access     BUFFALO  ClipDrive        1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 CCS
[    3.224250] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] 507904 512-byte logical blocks: (260 MB/248 MiB)
[    3.227885] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[    3.227899] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 23 00 00 00
[    3.231635] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page found
[    3.231645] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[    3.247551] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
[    6.323670] EXT4-fs (dm-0): orphan cleanup on readonly fs   # the 3 seconds gap is me unlocking the LUKS using the keyboard
[    6.323954] EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem 33a8b408-37ff-4b8a-98bf-bba8b6f00604 ro with ordered data mode. Quota mode: none.
[    6.324134] Mounting root: ok.