• rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It just baffles me why he would buy Twitter in the first place and even more so why he paid what he did for it. PayPal -> Tesla -> SpaceX -> Twitter. How does that make any sense in any way. So there’s that from the start, but then why is he firing a torpedo into it. Was his secret plan to bulldoze Twitter from the start? That’s a lot to pay for revenge.

    • popemichael@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The short of it:

      He made an offhand comment about buying twitter as a sort of “joke” but was then forced to go through with it thanks to the legal ramifications of said joke.

      sauce

  • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The sad thing is this guy will light $44B on fire, probably lose 99% of it, and not even feel it.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      $33 Billion.

      $13 Billion (of the $46 Billion deal) was loans from banks to Twitter.

      -$2 Billion of debt IIRC before the deal + $13 Billion from banks + $33 Billion from Elon Musk == $44 Billion (46 billion - 2 billion prior debts).

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’ll feel it because a lot of the deal was financed off of his Tesla stock. It isn’t that Musk will lose money from Twitter; he’ll lose some control over Tesla. Worse, it could push Tesla’s stock price down, which may be an issue as a lot of people shorted Tesla’s stock.

  • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it, though? I’m still waiting for the guys I’m following to move on, like Scott Manley for example.